![how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier](https://icdn.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/kindle-header-image.jpg)
![how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1580566395l/50653039.jpg)
He then discusses the misuse of church father passages by Roman Catholic apologists. He notes that, despite the claims of Rome, there is no such thing as 'the unanimous consent of the church fathers' on any issue except for maybe monotheism. Chapter 3: Here, he discusses the tradition of interpretation (i.e. the Easter Controversy, Cyprian and Stephen, Irenaeus and the Age of Jesus, etc.). He also notes that differences over what was the 'true' apostolic tradition arose very early on in the history of the Church. Chapter 2: Webster writes more about the view of 'tradition' in the early church. Webster cites several of these scholars throughout his work. is that while most Roman Catholic apologists argue very strongly for the historical claims of the Roman Catholic Church, many (if not most) Roman Catholic historical scholars concede that the early church did, in fact, believe that Scripture was the only infallible authority for the church in their day (and for us today). He cites many a historian (even Roman Catholic) on the issue. The amount of research that went into this work was quite likely extensive. Next, he cites the view during the early to mid Middle Ages by noting the writings of Thomas Aquinas, Anselm, and historical scholars. Roman Catholic apologists abuse these passages in a number of ways: they frequently cite such passages as these in isolation from the surrounding context, equivocate on terms such as 'tradition', or a combination thereof. apologetic use of passages by these church fathers. Webster also discusses and refutes the Roman Catholic. He goes into depth on the views of such church fathers as: Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius, John Chrysostom, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus, Basil of Caesarea, and especially Augustine.
![how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier how to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0343/0642/4891/products/ABO01BH_front_c2b3131e-72d3-46b1-8296-e1f588c3aa92.jpg)
"Chapter 1: In the first chapter Webster discusses how the early church fathers viewed Scripture, Tradition, and how they related to each other. I highly recommend it to all who embrace the authority of sacred Scripture." -R.C. This work by Keith Mathison is the finest and most comprehensive treatment of the matter I've seen. "The issue of sola Scriptura is not an abstract problem relevant only to the sixteenth-century Reformation, but one that poses increasingly more serious consequences for contemporary Christianity. Therein lies the goal of this book-an intriguing defense of the ancient (and classical Protestant) doctrine of sola Scriptura against the claims of Rome, the East, and modern Evangelicalism. The ancient, medieval, and classical Protestant view of sola Scriptura actually has a quite different shape than most opponents and defenders maintain. But these groups rest their cases on a recent, false take on sola Scriptura. In the past two decades, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox apologists have strongly tried to undermine sola Scriptura as unbiblical, unhistorical, and impractical.
#How to download ebooks to kindle from ligonier license#
In what shape do we find the doctrine of sola Scriptura today? Many modern Evangelicals see it as a license to ignore history and the creeds in favor of a more splintered approach to the Christian living.